Nano Banana Pro is Google DeepMind's Gemini 3 Pro image generation and editing model. FLUX is an open-weight model family from Black Forest Labs. Here is how they actually differ, and where TryOnWise fits if what you need is realistic photos of yourself from a single selfie.
Nano Banana Pro vs FLUX compared: what each actually does, where each wins, and which fits headshots, dating photos, or social content best.
Upload One Selfie — No app install and no prompt engineering. Add a clear photo of yourself and pick the look you are after.
AI Generates Photos of You — Instead of an imagined subject from a text prompt, TryOnWise keeps your real face and builds realistic variations around it.
Download Instantly — Pick your favourites and download high-quality images for dating apps, LinkedIn, or social media.
What is the difference between Nano Banana Pro and FLUX?
Nano Banana Pro is Google DeepMind's Gemini 3 Pro image generation and editing model: you generate or edit through Gemini and supported APIs, blending multiple reference images into one composite. FLUX is an open-weight model family from Black Forest Labs: you generate from a text prompt through any of the many services that host it, or run the weights yourself. They solve different problems, so the better question is usually which job you are trying to do.
Is Nano Banana Pro or FLUX better?
Nano Banana Pro wins on localized editing and character consistency across multiple reference images, plus strong text rendering at 2K and 4K. FLUX wins on prompt adherence and unusually clean text rendering inside images. Neither is universally better. Pick Nano Banana Pro if you are people editing composites, infographics, and layouts; pick FLUX if you are developers and users wanting a strong open-weight option.
What are the downsides of Nano Banana Pro?
The main limitation is that Google itself notes character consistency is not always reliable, and it is a broad creative tool rather than a personal photo service. It also runs on via Gemini plans or per-use API pricing, which matters if you only need photos once.
What are the downsides of FLUX?
The main limitation is that it is a general image model, so photographs of you specifically still require extra work on top. It runs on varies by host, or free if self-hosted.
Which is better for dating profile photos?
Neither is built for it. Nano Banana Pro is aimed at people editing composites, infographics, and layouts, and FLUX at developers and users wanting a strong open-weight option. Dating photos need variety across settings and outfits while still looking unmistakably like you, which is the specific gap TryOnWise fills.
Is there an alternative that keeps my real face?
That is the design goal of TryOnWise: it generates realistic photos of you from your own selfie rather than an imagined person or a stylised render, then lets you vary the outfit, setting, and lighting. You can compare it directly on our Nano Banana Pro and FLUX pages.